Guides → Playground & Guide → Overage Forecaster - When Will You Breach Your AI Budget?
Meet Carlos Mendez. Engineering manager owning the AI cost line. "We're 11 days into the month and at 47% of monthly budget. Are we going over?"
🔥 Last month we hit budget on day 28. Three more 'last months' and finance kills the project.
Month-to-date overage forecasting is daily FinOps for AI. Cloud has it solved (AWS Cost Explorer, third-party tools). AI is mostly post-mortem - 'oh we breached budget last month.' That's too late.
Carlos's team is at 47% of budget on day 11. Naive projection: 47% × (30/11) = 128% of budget. But days 1-3 had a load test (artificial spike). Days 8-11 had a holiday (artificial dip). Actual run-rate is closer to 105% of budget - slight overage, manageable.
This calc takes month-to-date spend, factors in trend + day-of-week patterns + known anomalies, and projects the end-of-month number. If you'll breach, it tells you which day.
Project when your AI spend hits the budget cap. Models trend + variance + vendor pricing. Get the breach date and the optimization runway you have left.
overage_forecast
Below: live sliders. Move them to see numbers change in real time. * Output uses the generic compute model — for precise numbers use the full calculator below.
Each input shapes your cost. Move the slider — see the impact.
Open the full calculator — pick a model, enter your tokens, see per-call, daily, monthly, and annual cost.
🚀 Open the full calculator →Projected EoM is the headline. Naive projection is MTD × (30/days_elapsed). Trend-adjusted is naive × multiplier. Both are useful - naive is conservative, trend-adjusted is realistic.
Breach day tells you the runway. If you'll breach on day 26, you have 15 days to optimize. If breach on day 35 (i.e., not this month), you have time to bring optimization in next month's plan.
Overage amount is the conversation. Sub-10% overage is usually absorbed quietly. 10-25% triggers a finance conversation. 25%+ becomes board-level if budget is large.
Watch the day-of-week effect. B2B usage drops weekends - weekend MTD undercounts run-rate. Late-month projections from early-week data tend to under-project.
Same calculator, three different team sizes. Click a tab to see how the numbers shift.
Day 5, $1,900 spent, projects to $11,400/month. 14% over. You have 25 days to ship optimization or talk to finance. This is the right time to act.
Healthy range: Day 5 projection at 114% - early warning
Carlos's actual snapshot. Naive projection $12,800 = 28% over. With trend adjustment for the load-test spike + holiday dip, real number closer to $10,500 - 5% over, manageable. The trend multiplier matters.
Healthy range: Project: $12,800 - 28% overage
Day 25 with $8,800 spent - projection $10,560. 5 days remaining. Too late to ship optimization. Either accept the overage or hard-throttle for the last 5 days (rate-limit non-critical workloads).
Healthy range: Project: $10,560 - 5.6% over
Cost isn't the only dimension. Click any constraint — see how recommendations change.
Overage prevention should be automated, not manual. Set rate limits at 90% MTD to give yourself buffer. Set tier-downgrade rules at 95% to accept quality dip rather than budget breach.
Auto-throttling to cheap models is fine for non-critical workloads (background batch). For customer-facing workloads, hallucination spike from sudden tier change can cause more damage than budget breach.
If your HIPAA workload is on Anthropic Enterprise, don't auto-route to a non-BAA vendor to save money. Compliance breach > budget breach by orders of magnitude.
Same logic - don't sacrifice no-train tier for budget.
Voice agents, real-time features - don't rate-limit them to save money. Throttle batch/background instead.
Single-vendor lock-in means a vendor pricing surprise = mid-month overage with no recourse. Multi-vendor abstraction lets you shift load when one vendor's pricing makes overage likely.
Without daily review, you discover overage after it's irreversible. Worth 5 minutes of an SRE's morning.
Tradeoff analysis is where most AI projects go sideways. Talk to a CFO-grade AI cost analyst →
Pre-loaded scenarios for the most common applications. Click a tab to see realistic numbers — then the "Try this scenario" button to load it into the calculator above.
Weekly review use case. Day 14, $10.5K spent, light trend deceleration (post-launch normalization). Projects $22K - comfortably under $25K budget. Report green; no action needed.
Healthy range: Projected ~$22K - 12% under budget
Feature launched day 1. Day 8 already at 48% of budget. Trend multiplier 1.3 accounts for accelerating adoption. Projection: $35K, more than 2× budget. This is a 'go talk to your CTO today' situation.
Healthy range: Project: $35K - major overage
Caching shipped day 8. Day 15: $6.5K spent vs $9-10K projected pre-optimization. Trend multiplier 0.85 reflects the savings. Projection $11K vs $20K budget - caching has been a 40% reduction. Ship more optimization, or take savings to other line items.
Healthy range: Project: $11K - caching is working
Honest limitations — every model is wrong; some are useful. Where this one falls short:
For these, use: Annual Forecaster for the 12-month picture. Budget Planner to allocate before the month starts.
Author: Subu Vdaygiri, Founder & CEO of CloudIntelligence.ai. 17 years Fortune 100 (Ingram Micro, Siemens). Wharton CTO program · Kellogg CPO program · 10× AWS+Azure certified.
Why this matters: pricing for major vendors has dropped 40-90% in the last 24 months. A budget set 12 months ago is probably wrong by 30%+.
View 3-year history for →
Last-verified date is the most recent successful daily snapshot
(aicost_pricing_snapshots) or, when no snapshot exists yet,
the latest successful crawler run (aicost_crawler_runs).
10 of 10
vendors are currently verified. Aggregator services (TokenCost, AI Pricing Guru, etc.)
are not listed.
Derived from industry conventions, not directly published by the vendor. Typical conventions: cached input = 10% of base (90% off), Batch API = 50% of base (50% off).
| Vendor / Model | Field | Why it’s inferred |
|---|---|---|
| Anthropic — Claude Sonnet 4.6 | cachedInput |
Derived at 10% of input rate — Anthropic publishes 90% cache-hit discount on this tier. |
| Anthropic — Claude Sonnet 4.5 | cachedInput |
Derived at 10% of input rate; same 90% cache-hit convention as Sonnet 4.6. |
| Anthropic — Claude Sonnet 4.5 | batchInput |
Derived at 50% of standard input — Anthropic documents uniform 50% Batch discount. |
| Anthropic — Claude Sonnet 4.5 | batchOutput |
Derived at 50% of standard output — Anthropic documents uniform 50% Batch discount. |
| Anthropic — Claude Haiku 4.5 | cachedInput |
Derived at 10% of input rate — Anthropic 90% cache-hit discount convention. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5.4 Mini | cachedInput |
Derived at 10% of input — OpenAI documents automatic 90% discount on cache hits across GPT-5.x tier. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5.4 Nano | cachedInput |
Derived at 10% of input — OpenAI 90% cache-hit convention. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5.4 Nano | batchInput |
Derived at 50% of input — OpenAI Batch API uniform 50% discount. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5.4 Nano | batchOutput |
Derived at 50% of output — OpenAI Batch API uniform 50% discount. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5.4 Pro | cachedInput |
Derived at 10% of input — OpenAI 90% cache-hit convention. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5.4 Pro | batchInput |
Derived at 50% of input — OpenAI Batch API uniform 50% discount. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5.4 Pro | batchOutput |
Derived at 50% of output — OpenAI Batch API uniform 50% discount. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5.2 | cachedInput |
Derived at 10% of input; no residency uplift. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5.2 | batchInput |
Derived at 50% of input. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5.2 | batchOutput |
Derived at 50% of output. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5 | cachedInput |
Derived at 10% of input. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5 | batchInput |
Derived at 50% of input. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5 | batchOutput |
Derived at 50% of output. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5.5 Pro | cachedInput |
Derived at 10% of input — OpenAI does not publish a cached rate for *-pro models; using the family convention. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5.5 Pro | batchInput |
Derived at 50% of input. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5.5 Pro | batchOutput |
Derived at 50% of output. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5.2 Pro | cachedInput |
Derived at 10% of input — pro-tier convention. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5.2 Pro | batchInput |
Derived at 50% of input. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5.2 Pro | batchOutput |
Derived at 50% of output. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5.1 | batchInput |
Derived at 50% of input. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5.1 | batchOutput |
Derived at 50% of output. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5 Pro | batchInput |
Derived at 50% of input. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5 Pro | batchOutput |
Derived at 50% of output. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5 Nano | cachedInput |
Derived at 10% of input. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5 Nano | batchInput |
Derived at 50% of input. |
| OpenAI — GPT-5 Nano | batchOutput |
Derived at 50% of output. |
| Google — Gemini 3 Flash | cachedInput |
Derived at 10% of input — Google caching discount convention ~90%. |
| Google — Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | cachedInput |
Derived at 10% of input — Google caching convention. |
| Google — Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | batchInput |
Derived at 50% of input — Google Batch API uniform 50% discount. |
| Google — Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | batchOutput |
Derived at 50% of output — Google Batch API uniform 50% discount. |
| Google — Gemini 2.5 Pro | cachedInput |
Derived at 10% of input. |
| Google — Gemini 2.5 Flash | cachedInput |
Derived at 10% of input. |
| Google — Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | cachedInput |
Derived at 10% of input — Google caching convention. |
| Google — Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | batchInput |
Derived at 50% of input — Google Batch API uniform 50% discount. |
| Google — Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | batchOutput |
Derived at 50% of output — Google Batch API uniform 50% discount. |
| Google — Gemini 2.0 Flash | cachedInput |
Derived at 25% of input per Google 2.0 family caching rates. |
| Google — Gemini 2.0 Flash | batchInput |
Derived at 50% of input — Google Batch API uniform 50% discount. |
| Google — Gemini 2.0 Flash | batchOutput |
Derived at 50% of output — Google Batch API uniform 50% discount. |
| Google — Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | cachedInput |
Derived at 10% of input — Google caching convention. |
| Google — Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | batchInput |
Derived at 50% of input — Google Batch API uniform 50% discount. |
| Google — Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | batchOutput |
Derived at 50% of output — Google Batch API uniform 50% discount. |
| xAI — Grok 4 (legacy) | cachedInput |
Extrapolated at 25% of base. |
Pricing is cross-verified against the
LiteLLM community registry
when available. Daily snapshots are kept in aicost_pricing_snapshots;
every change is logged to aicost_price_changelog with old & new
values for full audit trail. Read the full methodology →